Brown v. Board was about a little girl name Linda and her sister.They lived in Topeka,Kansas were the schools were seperated by color.Linda and her sister had to walk dangerous railroads in order to go to school. The school closer to them was for whites only.The browns then took the case to court.The law question was should there be segerated shools even if they are equal?The browns won the case 9 to 0 because the chief of the jury made everyone of the other believe in the browns argument.
The Browns argued that the segerated schools were hurting the black kids beacuse when they did them the doll test they ask them which the was prettier and they picked the black doll.They also said that segerated school violated the consitition.They also argued that it violated the14 amendement,because kids at the school werent being treated equal.They said "No state should deny to any person withn its jurisdiction the equal protection of laws''.
Topeka argued that both schools were equal and that segerated schools werent hurting nobody in the school.They said that as long as they were equal it was okay to have segerated schools.Topeka also said that it did not violate the consition.They also said that it did not violate the 14 amendemt.Topeka lost to the browns 0 to9
Links to this case. http://www.uscourts.gov/educational-resources/educational-activities/history-brown-v-board-education-re-enactment
http://www.history.com/topics/black-history/brown-v-board-of-education-of-topeka
Topeka argued that both schools were equal and that segerated schools werent hurting nobody in the school.They said that as long as they were equal it was okay to have segerated schools.Topeka also said that it did not violate the consition.They also said that it did not violate the 14 amendemt.Topeka lost to the browns 0 to9
Links to this case. http://www.uscourts.gov/educational-resources/educational-activities/history-brown-v-board-education-re-enactment
http://www.history.com/topics/black-history/brown-v-board-of-education-of-topeka